Rowanoak Law LLP - Serving Sylvan Lake & Central Alberta
  • Home
  • Chambers Arbitrations
  • About Us
    • Areas of Law >
      • Family Law >
        • Family Law - General
        • Collaborative Family Law
        • Children's Law
      • Adult Guardianship and Trusteeship
      • Civil Litigation
      • Corporate and Commercial Law
      • Probate & Estate Administration
      • Estate Litigation
      • Mediation and Arbitration
      • Real Estate
      • Wills, Enduring Power of Attorney and Personal Directives
      • Contracts
      • Immigration
      • Trademark
    • Other Services >
      • Boardroom Rental
      • Notary Public
      • Limited Retainer
    • Our Lawyers >
      • Sharon J. Crooks Q.C.
      • Kelly R. Stewart
      • Allison Ross
      • Christopher J. Dick
      • Harry W. Sawchuk
      • Irvin A. Bautista
      • Corbin J. Zoeteman
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Careers
  • Upcoming Seminars

Matrimonial Property: Date for Valuation

12/6/2018

3 Comments

 
In Alberta, the Divorce Act of Canada is a Canadian statute which governs divorce, custody, child access, child support and spousal support across all Canada, while the Matrimonial Property Act is an Alberta statute that governs division of land, bank accounts, investments, pensions, RIFs, RRSPs, RESPs and other assets, generally for Alberta residents, either upon the granting of a divorce judgment or at a separate time which may be coupled with divorce proceedings.

Often separation of the parties as man and wife occurs a significant time before either an agreement is signed between the parties dividing matrimonial assets, or a Trial is held to order division of property. Although the law has usually held that division of property should be decided at Trial, in recent times there has been a debate in legal circles as to whether some property acquired by either the husband or the wife after separation of the parties, but before a Divorce Judgment is granted, should be included in the division of property.
In the case of Rands v Rands [2011] A.J. No. 1197 the court divided pension interests at the date of separation, not at the date of Trial.  The rationale of the court was that pension assets differed  in situations of long separations prior to Trial because ongoing contributions by one spouse during employment may continue during the separation while the other spouse makes no contributions. This means that any increase in value of the pension after separation is attributable only to the continuing contributions of the employed spouse.

The same judge in  Zama  v. Vanderzwaag [2016) A.J. No. 1367 divided RRSPs, a TFSA, and shares at the date of separation, ruling that the increased value of those assets after separation should attribute only to the husband.

However, a subsequent case Smith v. Smith [2015] A.J. No.1410, while referring to the Rands decision, declined to divide as of separation because there was not a significant difference in the value of pensions between the date of separation and the date of Trial.
At this time the law remains that in general assets will be divided at the time of Trial.  This means that spouses who acquire assets after separation, but before Trial, may be accountable for division of those assets. This is additional to assets acquired during their marriage and while they lived together."


Jim MacSween

Jim is a Partner with Rowanoak Law Office LLP.

3 Comments
Daryl
4/21/2019 09:27:10 am

Hi, very nice website, cheers!
-----------------------------------------
Need cheap hosting for just $10/year? Or VPS, where plans starts with $6/Mo?

Check here: url16.com/fdgjbilsd

Reply
Orange County Divorce Attorneys link
6/6/2022 09:42:11 am

Trial in recent times there has been a debate in legal circles as to whether some property I truly appreciate your great post!

Reply
Orange County Family Law Attorneys link
6/6/2022 10:16:14 am

The rationale of the court was that pension assets differed in situations of long separations prior Thank you for sharing your great post!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Rowanoak Law Group LLP

    Welcome to Rowanoak Law Office LLP blog.  Stay tuned for blog posts every week from our lawyers.

    Archives

    August 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    April 2017

    Categories

    All
    Litigation
    Questioning

    RSS Feed

Copyright © 2016 Rowanoak Law LLP - All Rights Reserved
Developed by Creative 4 Site

​Click Here to Log In
Click to set custom HTML
  • Home
  • Chambers Arbitrations
  • About Us
    • Areas of Law >
      • Family Law >
        • Family Law - General
        • Collaborative Family Law
        • Children's Law
      • Adult Guardianship and Trusteeship
      • Civil Litigation
      • Corporate and Commercial Law
      • Probate & Estate Administration
      • Estate Litigation
      • Mediation and Arbitration
      • Real Estate
      • Wills, Enduring Power of Attorney and Personal Directives
      • Contracts
      • Immigration
      • Trademark
    • Other Services >
      • Boardroom Rental
      • Notary Public
      • Limited Retainer
    • Our Lawyers >
      • Sharon J. Crooks Q.C.
      • Kelly R. Stewart
      • Allison Ross
      • Christopher J. Dick
      • Harry W. Sawchuk
      • Irvin A. Bautista
      • Corbin J. Zoeteman
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Careers
  • Upcoming Seminars